" I also removed one irrelevant expletive."
Expletives are NEVER irrelevant to the trained accident investigator.
I am concerned that a rise in anti-science fundamentalist religious fervor here and abroad is generating increasing pressue both subtle and inexorable to bowdlerize research and particularly critical communication via recordings and transcripts such as this.
The frequency, tone, and specific selection of expletives provides great insight into the perceptions, perspectives, anxiety levels, frustrations, resignation, perceived or disregarded danger, and other critical aspects of the cockpit environment and accident concatenation. They often mark the first discernible onset of concern long before alarms flash. The first expletive on the USAir427 CVR for example is not harsh and delivered almost lightheartedly revealing that the crew saw no threat from the momentary turbulence or felt their initial extreme control response was unwarranted. The selection and tone of San Diego PSA expletives by contrast confirm certain of the crew felt their situation was hopeless and had ceased to function as airmen.
Censorship of such core information must be deplored and discouraged. Accident investigation is a scientific secular pursuit of truth to achieve future accident prevention and should not be constrained by medæval sensibilities and superstition. We're all educated grown-ups here, one hopes.