Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
41
Listener Forum / Re: Frequency Request - ZAU
« Last post by dave on January 04, 2022, 10:28:22 AM »
124.8 comes in great at the KBMI receiver site. The only issue is bleedover from Tower on 124.6 since the receiver is very close to KBMI and SDR doesn't have the ability to filter between 124.6 and 124.8. ZAU controller was heard but he must have been working two frequencies since aircraft were not heard.
42
Listener Forum / Re: MDPP
« Last post by dave on January 04, 2022, 10:09:28 AM »
123.775 has been added.
43
Listener Forum / Re: Cenamer 133.500 (Sector 1)
« Last post by JetScan1 on January 04, 2022, 09:39:02 AM »
Quote
Not able to split at those locations at the moment but will check into adding the frequency.

Thanks Dave. Looking at the AIP it looks like 133.500 has officially replaced 123.900 in Sector 1. With 123.900 being reassigned as a secondary Oceanic frequency.

http://www.ahac.gob.hn/AIPMH_AMDT_1521/AIP_2114/Eurocontrol/HONDURAS/2021-11-04-AIRAC/html/eAIP/ES-MH-ENR-2.1-es-ES.html#ENR-2

http://www.ahac.gob.hn/AIPMH_AMDT_1521/AIP_2114/Eurocontrol/HONDURAS/2021-11-04-AIRAC/html/eAIP/MAPS/ENR/MH_ENR%206-8%20CHART_CENAMER%20SECTORS.pdf
44
Listener Forum / Re: Cenamer 133.500 (Sector 1)
« Last post by dave on January 04, 2022, 09:12:40 AM »
Not able to split at those locations at the moment but will check into adding the frequency.
45
Listener Forum / Re: Can't reinstall application
« Last post by dave on January 04, 2022, 09:12:05 AM »
That's odd.....contact us at: https://www.liveatc.net/ct/contact.php

and we can investigate further with you. Send details: phone model, Android OS version, etc.
46
Listener Forum / Cenamer 133.500 (Sector 1)
« Last post by JetScan1 on January 03, 2022, 08:35:54 PM »
It appears Cenamer Control (Central America) has been using 133.500 (in place of 123.900) in Sector 1 (High Altitude over Guatemala, Belize, Honduras, El Salvador). Any chance 133.500 could be added to the LiveATC feeds that cover this area ? The feeds at MHRO, MHLC, MHTG, MSLP. If it's at all possible having the Cenamer frequencies split from the local ones would be ideal as some of these Tower/Approach frequencies can be very busy at times.
47
Listener Forum / Re: Frequency Request - ZAU
« Last post by JetScan1 on January 03, 2022, 08:12:22 PM »
Quote
ZAU41 is no longer used; ZAU45 covers FL240-FL999. I am not sure where the RCAG for 128.400 is, unfortunately.

I made a mistake on the frequency, it was 124.800 (not 128.400). Latest info. I could find is it's a backup frequency for ZAU45 with the RCAG located at Bloomington Il. I seem to recall a few years ago someone here mentioning it was simulcalsting with 134.025 ? There is a Bloomington LiveATC feed, maybe 124.800 could be added as a test ?
48
Listener Forum / Re: Frequency Request - ZAU
« Last post by avgeek123 on January 02, 2022, 12:05:30 AM »
avgeek123,

Is ZAU41, 128.400, used much ? Checking my notes 41 sits over 45 and covers FL350 and above when required. The controller on 134.025 used to simulcast on 128.400 when 41 was combined into 45. Is this still the case ? Where is the RCAG for 128.400 located ? Might be within range of another LiveATC site and useful if they do still simulcast on it ?

Hello! Happy new year. ZAU41 is no longer used; ZAU45 covers FL240-FL999. I am not sure where the RCAG for 128.400 is, unfortunately.
49
Listener Forum / Re: Frequency Request - ZAU
« Last post by JetScan1 on January 01, 2022, 09:28:04 AM »
avgeek123,

Is ZAU41, 128.400, used much ? Checking my notes 41 sits over 45 and covers FL350 and above when required. The controller on 134.025 used to simulcast on 128.400 when 41 was combined into 45. Is this still the case ? Where is the RCAG for 128.400 located ? Might be within range of another LiveATC site and useful if they do still simulcast on it ?
50
A couple of questions:

Is it typical (at most airports) for the runway used for visual approaches to be shorter than the runway on which there's an instrument approach?

Also, some airports, like KPWK have a circle to land instrument approach that's standard. I'm thinking that KSEE doesn't have that type of approach and
the change in runway was per pilot request.

Also, I'm thinking that the video that appears to simulate being in the flight deck that was posted by some outlets is computer generated and doesn't have anything to do with a camera or other aircraft-specific equipment.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10