airtraffic

Author Topic: Congress rejects Passenger Rights Bill!  (Read 5762 times)

Offline NAplaya16-ATC

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
Congress rejects Passenger Rights Bill!
« on: March 27, 2008, 00:08:16 UTC »
Don't have a link to it, but Congress turns down a bill that would give passengers on planes that are stuck on ramps, taxiways, etc the rights to food, water, bathrooms, etc.   Also, it prevents passengers from being removed from the planes while being stuck at airports!   And we all know the whole JetBlue story from awhile ago where it was stuck on the ramp for 9 hours and no one was taken off the plane.

To me, if i was stuck at an airport on a ramp for more than 1 hour, id be throwin a sh**-fit! 

whats yall's thoughts on this??

-NAplaya



Offline mhawke

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Congress rejects Passenger Rights Bill!
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2008, 02:45:56 UTC »
I travel quite frequently for business (1 week a month + 2 international trips a year).  I have done the long wait in the plane twice.  Once for 3 hours in 95 degree heat, without the air conditioning running on the plane.  We had to depend on open doors to provide any ventilation and the crew handed out water for awhile but ran out.

The second time was in the cold at Chicago, but heat was on and plane was semi-comfortable.  In reality, that day it was probably better being on the plane then in the airport, since there were no seats in the airport.

I do believe that congress needs to do something.  The airlines are not going to regulate themselves because they have proven lately that they do not care about the opinions or treatment of their passengers.  Most planes are so full right now, you have limited choices about which airline you will use.

The recent bill of rights that New York passed is being challenged in appeals court and the bill will probably get struck down because it limits interstate commerce, which the constitution does not allow a state to do.

Without something in writing, the airlines will continue to do whatever they want.  It is appalling to me to for the airline to think that just because I boarded a plane, they have the right to hold me on the plane against my will.  I understand and fully respect the power of the pilot to control the plane on all the people on board.  But I challange trying to extend that power to a plane stuck on the ground because of weather, ATC, mechanical, or any other reason.  In my book, its equivalent to kidnapping.

Offline KSYR-pjr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1722
Re: Congress rejects Passenger Rights Bill!
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2008, 13:40:40 UTC »
I travel quite frequently for business (1 week a month + 2 international trips a year). 

You need to learn to fly!  :)  :)

Offline w0x0f

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 342
Re: Congress rejects Passenger Rights Bill!
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2008, 17:53:33 UTC »
It was not Congress which turned down a bill.  A federal appeals court threw out a New York state law mandating passenger rights.  The argument against New York's law was that only the federal government can regulate the airline industry. 

This judgment makes sense.  Could you imagine 50 different passenger rights laws?  Congress now is tasked with this proposed law.

Here is a link.  http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpposted/archive/2008/03/26/court-grounds-new-york-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights.aspx


The US House of Representatives passed HR 2881 in September which contained many of these passenger rights among other things.  The bill is floundering in the Senate much due to Sen Jay Rockefeller insisting upon user fees for general aviation pilots.  Sen Rockefeller has clout since he is the chairman of the subcommittee on aviation.

 
w0x0f

Offline tyketto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1142
Re: Congress rejects Passenger Rights Bill!
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2008, 18:16:49 UTC »
Incidentally, the state court of appeals here in California rejected a similar bill the same day. They lauded the bill, saying that it was a great gesture, but as aviation is handled federally, it is up to Congress to handle this issue.

So it isn't dead, but it is now up to the Blues and Reds in Washington to hash it out.

BL.