Author Topic: Cleveland CNTR feed  (Read 36062 times)

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« on: December 26, 2005, 11:12:02 PM »
would anyone here be interested in a  Cleveland  CNTR feed? i will try to get one up but, i dont know how well it will receive. if anything it will be mainly controller. send me some freqs that you guys have and I will try them out.



Offline JetScan1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2005, 01:14:03 PM »
I'd be interested in a Cleveland Center feed ! Primarily the high altitude sectors. What's your reception like on 135.175, 132.125, 121.075, 125.425 ? These are the 4 high sectors overhead and to the south of the Pittsburgh area.

DJ

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2005, 01:17:40 PM »
not bad, comes in ok. could be better.

Offline JetScan1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2005, 01:29:58 PM »
Can you hear the controllers on any of those frequencies ?

Is your reception better in certain directions ? Like are there any hills or buildings in the way that could be blocking reception ?

What about to the north on 133.075 and 119.725 ? And to the northwest on 133.375 and 119.875 ? Any controllers on any of these frequencies ?

DJ

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2005, 01:43:52 PM »
I picked something up on these, that is just some i believe, but its a mix
133.075
120.4
135.175
120.6
132.15
121.075
126.95
132.125

Offline JetScan1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2005, 02:02:51 PM »
My only suggestion would be that if you are going to set up a Cleveland feed please don't try and scan too many busy frequencies at the same time. The radios here that are scanning 10 to 20 busy frequencies at once are totally useless as you end up missing so many transmissions that you can't follow what is going on. You might as well just be listening to random gibberish. Some of those Cleveland sectors can get pretty busy, I'd probably scan maybe 4 frequencies at the most if I was setting it up. Just my opinion.

DJ

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2005, 03:05:24 PM »
well, now all i need to do is run out to radioshack.

Offline MIAMIATC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 783
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2005, 09:43:15 PM »
i would love to hear 132.925 and 134.125 along J-584 and J-70 inbound's to EWR and JFK before they are handed off to NY ARTCC and maybe if Pit can get 134.775 and 120.075. Good Luck PIT and hope to be hearing the feed soon. Oh one more thing as well as the forementioned 119,875/133.375 sector they have on top of them 120.325(ULTRAHIGH ALT)

Offline Breton

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Feed
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2005, 12:13:56 AM »
yes I would be interested

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2005, 12:20:34 AM »
o good. well, for now the feeds are being hosted by 3 different notebooks. i am trying to either buy a old PC off my school or go out and buy 2 sound cards and put them in my PC downstairs. i am also thinking about buying another Radioshack PRO-2052 and using that for the CLE CNTR feed. The Radioshack PRO-89 is the scanner i planned on using for the CLE feed, but it doesnt recieve well. even with external antenna, it still doesnt recieve well. thats why i am considering buying the other scanner.

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #10 on: December 28, 2005, 12:22:37 AM »
im debating between these two. i allready have the 2052 but they seem the same. if i buy the 2052 i think i can do text tags . i dont know about  the 2054

http://www.liveatc.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1245

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #11 on: December 28, 2005, 12:09:53 PM »
im just waiten for Dave to give me a feed download now than it should be ready :P

Offline dave

  • Site Founder
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4597
    • LiveATC.net
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #12 on: December 28, 2005, 01:08:21 PM »
The Pro-2052 should be able to do text tags.

Dave

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #13 on: December 28, 2005, 01:35:05 PM »
i just need to go out and buy cables now, but the Cle cntr feed is up

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #14 on: December 28, 2005, 01:38:39 PM »
http://audio.liveatc.net:8012/zob_wpa.m3u

ttp://map3.flightaware.com/airport_map.rvt?ident=KPIT;key=0fece55a82cfaae99d47641842ad9083812a1023;height=600;width=800

133.075
133.175
120.6
132.125
120.4
125.425
19.725
135.175
124.4
121.075
128.15
133.375

Offline JetScan1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2005, 04:55:29 PM »
I see you have good controller reception on 121.075 and 133.075 (Moon Township PAL), but your reception of aircraft is very poor. You can hear aircraft to the south but your reception range to the north and northwest is non existent. If you have 133.375 and 119.725 selected you are not picking up any traffic on these two frequencies. You also have 133.175 listed, but I don't show this as any active Cleveland frequency ?

DJ

Offline PHL Approach

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 742
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #16 on: December 28, 2005, 05:02:30 PM »
133.17 is the LRP26 sector for ZNY. It's low altitude for soutbound Potomac Arrivals

Offline JetScan1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #17 on: December 28, 2005, 05:13:28 PM »
Quote
133.17 is the LRP26 sector for ZNY. It's low altitude for soutbound Potomac Arrivals


Is that a recent change ? I show ZNY LRP26 as frequency as 133.675. Anyway it would be totally out of range of a PIT radio.

DJ

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #18 on: December 28, 2005, 05:18:37 PM »
yeah, idk what that is but, what i did was i put every CLE Cntr freq in and just wrote down the freqs that i heard aircraft/controller on and idk where that freq came from but i saw it so i wrote it down. sry ill look into it

and MOON Twp is Pittsburgh its just the a suburb that PIT Intl is in, i guess i should of put moon but i just always known it as pittsburgh so. sry

Offline PHL Approach

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 742
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #19 on: December 28, 2005, 05:26:59 PM »
Quote from: JetScan1
Quote
133.17 is the LRP26 sector for ZNY. It's low altitude for soutbound Potomac Arrivals


Is that a recent change ? I show ZNY LRP26 as frequency as 133.675. Anyway it would be totally out of range of a PIT radio.

DJ


DJ, they have been using 33.17 for the past year or so. They we're having problems with reception/ bleed on 33.67. Once in a while they will have 33.67 up, but I think it's cause they are testing it with no luck.

Ed

Offline JetScan1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #20 on: December 28, 2005, 05:35:09 PM »
Quote
they have been using 33.17 for the past year or so. They we're having problems with reception/ bleed on 33.67. Once in a while they will have 33.67 up, but I think it's cause they are testing it with no luck.


Okay, thanks for the update.

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #21 on: December 28, 2005, 05:35:46 PM »
does anyone have an online map of ZOB?

Offline PHL Approach

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 742
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #22 on: December 28, 2005, 05:47:34 PM »
This is from my ARTCC on Vatsim:

Low Sectors: Go down the bottom for all the Low Sectors
http://www.zobartcc.org/sop/zob/chapter3.pdf

High Sectors: Once again down at the bottom, that's not all the High's but it's a start
http://www.zobartcc.org/sop/zob/chapter4.pdf

Offline PIT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #23 on: December 29, 2005, 03:38:23 PM »
The CLE CNTR and PIT feed now have Radioshack PRO-2052 scanners on them. I went and got another one. last one in stock to. i hope it helps clear things up.

Offline JetScan1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
Cleveland CNTR feed
« Reply #24 on: December 29, 2005, 04:35:34 PM »
The reception does sound better, but your range is still very poor to the north. Are there hills or buildings in the way ? DJ