Author Topic: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours  (Read 10789 times)

Offline athaker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« on: November 18, 2009, 10:43:42 AM »
In one minute:



« Last Edit: November 23, 2009, 02:23:42 AM by athaker »



Offline joeyb747

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
  • Nothing Like A 747!
Re: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2009, 12:14:39 PM »
Pretty neat!  :-D

Offline Dngnkeeper

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 80
Re: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2009, 03:34:19 PM »
Now thats fun.

Offline Squawk 7700

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 563
    • Squawk 7700 on Flickr
Re: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2009, 11:57:15 PM »
reminds me of bacteria.

Offline jsapyta

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2009, 10:59:42 PM »
that is pretty neat.. there's one lone aircraft from the southern tip of South america to Africa.


Offline squeegeeboy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • You like airplanes too?
Re: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2009, 01:47:22 PM »
Very cool. It's neat to watch how the volume of traffic corresponds with where the sun is shining.

Offline phil-s

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 110
Re: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2009, 06:50:46 PM »
New to me were

1) The huge holes with no traffic - SE Pacific north of the occasional Chile to NZ/Australia flight, S Atlantic N of the occasional Bueno Aires/JBerg flight and something that looks like BA?Lagos, and 3) the central Indian Ocean.

2) How far south the Chile/NZ flights go. The low pressure systems there can dwarf anything in the N Atlantic or N Pacific.

3) The distortion caused by the Mercator projection. The flights near the N pole speed along like they're on crystal meth.

It must be lonely and maybe even a bit scary for the flight crews on those way south routes. Or is it pure pleasure not have to worry about traffic separation?

Offline Hollis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 403
Re: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2009, 03:42:38 AM »
About the longest scheduled flight is China Eastern CES588, an Airbus 340-600, from KJFK to ZSPD (Shangai). In fact one is now in flight somewhere over Northern Canada enroute via the Artic Circle Route. Departs daily from KJFK at 1AM EST.  Time enroute? 17 Hrs.!
Scary or just plain boring?
 

Offline phil-s

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 110
Re: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2009, 03:54:09 PM »
I htink the Arctic Circle routes are beautiful. Glaciers, wild coastlines, mountains, ice pack, and most of all the aurora! And there's at least some traffic and even radar coverage over parts of it. The Southern Ocean routes, OTOH, are water all the way. Auckland/Santiago - 11.5 hours, over water. One flight a day. Ok, narita/LA is all water also.  Anyway, the video is fascinating!

Offline mhawke

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2009, 06:56:01 PM »
About the longest scheduled flight is China Eastern CES588, an Airbus 340-600, from KJFK to ZSPD (Shangai). 

I think there is one longer.  I have taken the Newark to Singapore flight on Singapore Airlines before.  It's an all business class A340.  The flight when I took it was scheduled at 18 hours and actually ended up being just over 19 hours because we had 2 go arounds on landing at Changi from wind shear warnings.

Offline jonnevin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 79
Re: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« Reply #10 on: November 22, 2009, 11:08:56 PM »
aren't the big voids in air traffic actually areas without radar service?

Offline sykocus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 348
Re: World's Air Traffic over 24 hours
« Reply #11 on: November 23, 2009, 02:14:54 AM »
aren't the big voids in air traffic actually areas without radar service?

The majority of this data probably came from the FAA's ETMS which tracks all flights within the US as well as within many other countries' airspace that participate. It can take a plane's filed speed, flight plan and actual position reports and estimate where they are. Also many aircraft have ADS which automatically sends regular position reports via satellite and also allows a controller to "ping" an aircraft and it will respond with it's position on demand. The ETMS takes this plus actual radar data and can give a fairly good picture of many aircraft throughout the world even in area's w/o radar coverage.