airtraffic

Author Topic: TransAsia GE235 crash  (Read 15517 times)

Offline LeNeuph

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
TransAsia GE235 crash
« on: February 04, 2015, 08:02:45 UTC »
Audio of last communication with tower + Mayday call (Shortened)



Offline frcabot

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: TransAsia GE235 crash
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2015, 23:37:44 UTC »
:-( Now we just need a translation.

Edit: It looks like the Mayday call at 00:58 is in English although hard to understand, I think "Transasia 235, Mayday Mayday Engine Flameout"
The response from ATC sounds like : "Transasia 235 [unintelligible] contact Taipei Approach 119.7" Not sure what she says after other than repeated unsuccessful attempts to contact.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2015, 23:41:38 UTC by frcabot »

Offline Penwhale

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: TransAsia GE235 crash
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2015, 06:09:47 UTC »
:-( Now we just need a translation.

Edit: It looks like the Mayday call at 00:58 is in English although hard to understand, I think "Transasia 235, Mayday Mayday Engine Flameout"
The response from ATC sounds like : "Transasia 235 [unintelligible] contact Taipei Approach 119.7" Not sure what she says after other than repeated unsuccessful attempts to contact.

I think the ATC controller said "TransAsia 235 [unintelligible] try again contact Taipei Approach 119.7". Maybe even "TransAsia 235, please try again contact Taipei Approach 119.7"?

Offline Conan0910

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: TransAsia GE235 crash
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2015, 16:12:47 UTC »
Is it normal for controllers to tell a plane with an engine down to contact approach without saying anything else?

Offline flyflyfly

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: TransAsia GE235 crash
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2015, 21:45:01 UTC »
Is it normal for controllers to tell a plane with an engine down to contact approach without saying anything else?

Well, it at least shows she understood the emergency and offered an immediate return. She gave the frequency - all other information can wait and be exchanged later on. Swapping frequencies is quick, but saves the extra delay for tower/departure from coordinating and relaying - so speeds up communication for all involved. Also, a single engine failure usually isn't such a big deal, which would prevent a crew from changing frequencies - unlike Sully's double engine failure, where changing frequencies rightfully wasn't even suggested. And when a pilot prefers to stay on the frequency anyway, or delay the approach, he'll surely just say so (no need to ask).

So, yes, that was an extremely brief no-nonsense reply, but not really bad.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2015, 21:48:03 UTC by flyflyfly »

757-rules

  • Guest
Re: TransAsia GE235 crash
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2015, 18:36:42 UTC »
:-( Now we just need a translation.

Edit: It looks like the Mayday call at 00:58 is in English although hard to understand, I think "Transasia 235, Mayday Mayday Engine Flameout"
The response from ATC sounds like : "Transasia 235 [unintelligible] contact Taipei Approach 119.7" Not sure what she says after other than repeated unsuccessful attempts to contact.

Pilot: "Mayday, maday, engine burned out"
Corntroller: "Transasia 235 please return departure  contact approved,  119.7"

Edit: this is what I hear at 55 seconds..

« Last Edit: February 13, 2015, 11:02:02 UTC by Jetblast1 »

Offline JetScan1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1038
Re: TransAsia GE235 crash
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2015, 19:08:11 UTC »
Pilot: Mayday Mayday engines inop
Tower: Trans Asia Two Three Five Songshan Tower, Contact Taipei Approach One One Nine Decimal Seven

Offline Conan0910

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re:
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2015, 07:23:22 UTC »
i think the controller said something like 'transasia235 please return, contanct Taipei Approach 119.7'

Offline Mirlady

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: TransAsia GE235 crash
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2015, 07:52:01 UTC »
PILOT: ENGINE FLAME-OUT. :-D

Offline Mirlady

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: TransAsia GE235 crash
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2015, 07:53:32 UTC »
ATC: You need to (re)turn....