16:03 he hands 3407 off
And by experience the only thing mentioned here that rings a bell is the wind shear and direction changes present at the time. When the aircraft is in flaps transition, power settings require change, if the wind shear shifts during this phase it can cause the aircraft to fall or become unstable on the longitudinal axis. the dash has exceptional roll stability, but less than desired pitch stability.
This should have been a go around.
The nearest I can see by looking at historical data shows the wind direction did not change at the surface until 2 hours after the accident, and then only by 80 degrees or so. No mention on any of the METARs show a varying wind speed within the approach segment. Usually you will see a note of WS020/32030 or something like that to indicate potential shear on or near the airport. And most likely you would have had a PIREP if a preceeding a/c had encountered such conditions.
I know nothing about the Q400 but if it were unstable about the longitudinal axis, it would mean that it laterally unstable and affects the rolling properties of the a/c. Now if it had poor longitudinal stability, that would be around the lateral axis and affect pitch.
And as for icing as a cause, I'm not going to speculate. When the NTSB publishes their findings we will know what happened with a certainty and hopefully learn some lessons.
"This should have been a go around" --------Were you there? Were you experiencing anything they were dealing with? Should DAL and AWE gone around too? Are you implying they shouldn't have landed under those circumstances? Everyday, we as pilots are thrown challenging circumstances such as ice, shear, TS, etc. Yet with the professionalism of these guys and gals, we make the best decision based on sound experience and quality training. DO NOT drag their name through the mud with your "speculation" and monday morning quarterbacking!