LiveATC Discussion Forums

Air Traffic Monitoring => Aviation Audio Clips => Topic started by: eastern tristar on September 20, 2010, 10:03:16 PM

Title: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: eastern tristar on September 20, 2010, 10:03:16 PM
Last night I was listening to JFK tower (Sunday 9/19/10) just before 10:30pm, when I heard Aerogal 700 (GLG700) almost landed on 13R when he was supposed to land on 13L
Jetblue 1087 was taking off on 13R, Delta 122 was just told to taxi into position and hold when Delta informed the controller that Aerogal just turned and was about to land on the wrong runway, it was very scary to listen to live but the controller did a great job dealing with it, always kept his cool and even his sense of humor.  I hope someone could edit and post it (I am clueless on how to do it) it is definately worth a listen to.  Thanks.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: Hollis on September 21, 2010, 12:31:16 AM
Here is the audio in real time: (un-edited)
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: speedotann on September 21, 2010, 01:09:47 AM
Nice Catch!
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: yurtkuran on September 21, 2010, 11:28:38 AM
I was onboard JetBlue 1087, listening to via the LiveATC iPhone app.   Needless to say, my increased dramatically listening to the exchange!
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: joeyb747 on September 21, 2010, 03:01:18 PM
Great Catch!  :-o

On a side note...anyone else catch at the 42 sec mark, Delta 122 asks if he still wants them to LINE UP AND WAIT, and the controller says "Yeah go ahead, POSITION AND HOLD"...  :wink:  :lol: 

Avherald:

http://avherald.com/h?article=431385e9&opt=0

Below is a pic of Aerogal Boeing 767-322/ER HC-CIJ (cn 25287/449), the aircraft operating 700 heavy that eve:
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: svoynick on September 22, 2010, 12:22:29 AM
On a side note...anyone else catch at the 42 sec mark, Delta 122 asks if he still wants them to LINE UP AND WAIT, and the controller says "Yeah go ahead, POSITION AND HOLD"...  :wink:  :lol: 
Yeah, I noticed that - I wonder if that's the first posting of a U.S. "Line up and wait" call on here...  Although I suppose it was not given by the controller as a clearance.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: w0x0f on September 22, 2010, 12:40:28 AM
On a side note...anyone else catch at the 42 sec mark, Delta 122 asks if he still wants them to LINE UP AND WAIT, and the controller says "Yeah go ahead, POSITION AND HOLD"...  :wink:  :lol: 
Yeah, I noticed that - I wonder if that's the first posting of a U.S. "Line up and wait" call on here...  Although I suppose it was not given by the controller as a clearance.

Yes, and this would be the first time in the USA that there was ever any confusion over a "position and hold clearance," or was that, "line up and wait."  We must thank those who have brought this to our shores. 

Of course, if it was up to the NTSB, we would not use position and hold/line up and wait, at all. Try to imagine how that would work.

w0x0f 
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: Robert Larson on September 23, 2010, 09:13:29 AM
"Check out the right window guys."   :lol:
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: svoynick on September 23, 2010, 11:19:27 AM
Yes, and this would be the first time in the USA that there was ever any confusion over a "position and hold clearance," or was that, "line up and wait."  We must thank those who have brought this to our shores. 
Are you implying that there was any "confusion" or failure of communication around the position & hold clearance?  I don't believe there was, nor was that the point of my post.  It seems clear to me that Delta 122 and tower were communicating and understanding each other just fine; in addition Delta performed his duty of looking around, and communicated his concerns to the controller who responded to the situation immediately.  I don't put this situation at the foot of "confusion over a position and hold clearance" or terminology at all - it is completely about confusion by the landing aircraft.  Does anyone hear it differently than I do?
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: flyflyfly on September 23, 2010, 04:54:51 PM
Yes, and this would be the first time in the USA that there was ever any confusion over a "position and hold clearance," or was that, "line up and wait."  We must thank those who have brought this to our shores. 
Are you implying that there was any "confusion" or failure of communication around the position & hold clearance?  I don't believe there was, nor was that the point of my post.  It seems clear to me that Delta 122 and tower were communicating and understanding each other just fine;

No worries guys, slow down, it's only a week from now for the line-up & wait vs p&h fun to really start!  :-D  It's not an issue this week - and certainly not here.
There was confusion - but only in the Aerogal cockpit (and a lot of it!).
Both, Delta 122 & tower performed really great. Good to see these pilots sharp and awake - and not relying on their clearance to enter the runway alone. And this is what pilots are really trained for: do the same procedures over and over again. Yet, always be prepared for the unexpected - be ready. Kudos to this professional Delta crew!
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: w0x0f on September 24, 2010, 04:33:47 PM
Yes, and this would be the first time in the USA that there was ever any confusion over a "position and hold clearance," or was that, "line up and wait."  We must thank those who have brought this to our shores. 
Are you implying that there was any "confusion" or failure of communication around the position & hold clearance?  I don't believe there was, nor was that the point of my post.  It seems clear to me that Delta 122 and tower were communicating and understanding each other just fine; in addition Delta performed his duty of looking around, and communicated his concerns to the controller who responded to the situation immediately.  I don't put this situation at the foot of "confusion over a position and hold clearance" or terminology at all - it is completely about confusion by the landing aircraft.  Does anyone hear it differently than I do?

I was referring to another thread.  Just getting ready for next week.  No one was confused in this situation except Aerogal.

w0x0f
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: Fryy/Avocadoflight on September 24, 2010, 04:54:45 PM
I tried to pull the archive for final but couldn't get it to come up. I ended up just getting the audio from tower right when GLG700 checks in. This clip is from the archives so it sounds a little bit clearer than the original post.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: svoynick on September 24, 2010, 10:27:20 PM
Yes, and this would be the first time in the USA that there was ever any confusion over a "position and hold clearance," or was that, "line up and wait."  We must thank those who have brought this to our shores. 
Are you implying that there was any "confusion" or failure of communication around the position & hold clearance?  I don't believe there was, nor was that the point of my post.  It seems clear to me that Delta 122 and tower were communicating and understanding each other just fine; in addition Delta performed his duty of looking around, and communicated his concerns to the controller who responded to the situation immediately.  I don't put this situation at the foot of "confusion over a position and hold clearance" or terminology at all - it is completely about confusion by the landing aircraft.  Does anyone hear it differently than I do?

I was referring to another thread.  Just getting ready for next week.  No one was confused in this situation except Aerogal.

w0x0f
Roger - thanks for clarifying...
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: compressorStall on September 26, 2010, 06:48:42 AM
That clip was too funny, and more so in light of a recent experience I had. I was in a Cessna (as a pax) that nearly taxied into the path of a landing heavy fifteen seconds before touchdown... we were first in the line-up. Just as I happened to glance around behind us I noticed something. It took me a few seconds to register that the guy behind us was frantically flashing his landing lights and waving a phone in an attempt to keep us off the runway.

All this because ground gave us the wrong tower freq., and this was the pilot's first trip to that airport, so he assumed the perceived radio silence was SOP.

Fun was had, though :D
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: aviator_06 on September 26, 2010, 03:26:01 PM
Sounds like that Aerogal crew needs to go back to do more training.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: john4321 on September 26, 2010, 11:55:13 PM
I'm still amazed that this runway near-incident almost happened. It reminds me of the possible Canary Island Tenerife type disaster that could have occurred. (pilot-error).

The Tenerife airport disaster in 1977 was a collision involving two Boeing 747 passenger aircraft on the runway of Los Rodeos Airport (now known as Tenerife North Airport) on the Spanish island of Tenerife, one of the Canary Islands. With 583 fatalities, the crash remains the deadliest accident in aviation history. All 248 aboard the fully fuelled KLM flight were killed. There were also 335 fatalities and 61 survivors from the Pan Am flight, which was struck along its spine by the KLM's landing gear, under-belly and four engines. Rescue crews were unaware for over 20 minutes that the Pan Am aircraft was also involved in the accident, because of the heavy fog and the separation of the crippled aircraft following the collision.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenerife_airport_disaster

john
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: svoynick on September 27, 2010, 02:52:24 AM
That clip was too funny, and more so in light of a recent experience I had. I was in a Cessna (as a pax) that nearly taxied into the path of a landing heavy fifteen seconds before touchdown... we were first in the line-up. Just as I happened to glance around behind us I noticed something. It took me a few seconds to register that the guy behind us was frantically flashing his landing lights and waving a phone in an attempt to keep us off the runway.

All this because ground gave us the wrong tower freq., and this was the pilot's first trip to that airport, so he assumed the perceived radio silence was SOP.
Just a clarification...  For the situation you described, are you saying this happened "because" the pilot got the wrong freq. from ground?  Respectfully, am I off-target to suggest that it happened because the pilot entered an active runway without a clearance?  

Are there controlled airports where it's "SOP" for silence to represent an implicit clearance?  (This is rhetorical...)
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: Heading090 on September 28, 2010, 02:07:50 PM
How is possible that ATC did not detect that Aerogal ended up on the final for the wrong runway?

Somebody cleared him for approach and, I would hope, made sure that he was heading for the correct runway. Shouldn't the tower controller be first to detect the error (radar screen, visual observation)?

Before we send Aerogal crew for more training we may want to look on the ATC role in this incident.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: flyflyfly on September 28, 2010, 03:48:29 PM
How is possible that ATC did not detect that Aerogal ended up on the final for the wrong runway?

Somebody cleared him for approach and, I would hope, made sure that he was heading for the correct runway. Shouldn't the tower controller be first to detect the error (radar screen, visual observation)?

Before we send Aerogal crew for more training we may want to look on the ATC role in this incident.
It was the Canarsie approach to runways 13. It requires an approach at an angle of about 90 degrees, and a sharp right turn on short final. The turn is only 2miles from the runway, so the time between turning, aligning and landing is really short. Landing clearance may be given before the plane has even turned.

We don't know the timing here. It is well possible that Delta was watching Aerogal's approach and spotted their mistake immediately, while Aerogal was still turning. A controller, busy watching his radar, would take several extra seconds to spot this.

And, ATC instructions were clear - "cleared to land 13L". The pilots are responsible for flying the plane. When they align with the wrong runway, it's their fault - not ATC's.

Ah, this reminds me of this great audio:
http://www.liveatc.net/forums/atcaviation-audio-clips/ual-56-vs-atc-at-sfo-last-night/
"I fly the airplane - YOU just clear us for take-off!"  :-D
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: Marty Becker on September 28, 2010, 06:06:58 PM
KJFK 13L Canarsie  Approach

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJXPXUD6Opo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EQ9-m-nuPI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAuyPhUYApA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CahWvTbRc4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnEtr6Ei1sc

Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: flyflyfly on September 29, 2010, 03:11:42 AM
KJFK 13L Canarsie  Approach

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnEtr6Ei1sc
He he, I like how the captain asks his flying co-pilot "You see the runway?". This is like 30 seconds before touch-down... :-)

Approach charts to runways 13:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2480636/JFK-VOR-OR-GPS-RWY-13LR-0804

Note the subtle difference between 13R and 13L: 13R requires a 90 degree turn at the same spot where 13L requires the first 45 degree turn...
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: sykocus on September 29, 2010, 05:16:53 AM
interestingly enough there's also a charted visual approach to 13L/R that seems to follow the VOR-GPS ground track
 http://airnav.com/depart?http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/1010/00610PARKWAY_VIS13LR.PDF (PDF file)
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: joeyb747 on September 29, 2010, 10:06:00 AM
I'm still amazed that this runway near-incident almost happened. It reminds me of the possible Canary Island Tenerife type disaster that could have occurred. (pilot-error).

The Tenerife airport disaster in 1977 was a collision involving two Boeing 747 passenger aircraft on the runway of Los Rodeos Airport (now known as Tenerife North Airport) on the Spanish island of Tenerife, one of the Canary Islands. With 583 fatalities, the crash remains the deadliest accident in aviation history. All 248 aboard the fully fuelled KLM flight were killed. There were also 335 fatalities and 61 survivors from the Pan Am flight, which was struck along its spine by the KLM's landing gear, under-belly and four engines. Rescue crews were unaware for over 20 minutes that the Pan Am aircraft was also involved in the accident, because of the heavy fog and the separation of the crippled aircraft following the collision.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenerife_airport_disaster

john

Or how about US Air 1493 and Skywest 5569? Boeing 737-300 (N388US) collided with a Skywest Metroliner (N683AV) while landing at KLAX on 02/01/91. US Air 1493 was cleared to land on 24L while Skywest 5569 was holding in position for an intersection departure. Upon touchdown, the US Air crew noticed the Metroliner sitting on the runway, but it was too late. During the investigation, it was determined that Skywest's operating procedure was to turn the landing lights and strobe lights on ONLY AFTER being cleared for takeoff, she sat on the runway with her nav lights and anti-collision beacon on only. The Metroliner was invisible to the US Air crew as they made the approach. The NTSB recreated the conditions that evening, placing a Metroliner at the intersection Skywest 5569 was sitting at, and flew the approach in a helicopter. They could not see the Metroliner on the runway until they were almost over top of it. Controller Error was sighted in this crash that killed all 12 souls on the Metroliner and 22 souls on the B737.

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?id=DCA91MA018A&rpt=fi

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USAir_Flight_1493

http://www.planecrashinfo.com/w19910201.htm

Obviously, it was not controller error in the Aerogal incident. The tower controller did a great job handling the issue. And hats off to the ON POINT Delta crew! Way to keep your heads up! Had they not noticed the Aerogal turning final for the wrong runway, and taxied into position, the outcome could have been very similar to the above US Air-Skywest crash, only on a much grander scale. A B767-300, B757-200, and an E190 were the aircraft present at that time. Aerogal 700H was a B767-300, Delta 122 was a Boeing 757-200 bound for Shannon (EINN), and Jet Blue 1087, the aircraft that was rolling on the runway, was an E190 bound for KCLT.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: iskyfly on September 29, 2010, 01:12:48 PM


Note the subtle difference between 13R and 13L: 13R requires a 90 degree turn at the same spot where 13L requires the first 45 degree turn...

Turning to line up for 13R off the Canarsie approach requires rather more effort than the more gradual turn for 13L. They must have really thought they were cleared for 13R.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: NY Z Pilot on September 30, 2010, 11:32:06 AM
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/video?id=7697295&syndicate=syndicate&section
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: NY Z Pilot on September 30, 2010, 11:33:14 AM


Note the subtle difference between 13R and 13L: 13R requires a 90 degree turn at the same spot where 13L requires the first 45 degree turn...

Turning to line up for 13R off the Canarsie approach requires rather more effort than the more gradual turn for 13L. They must have really thought they were cleared for 13R.


Lead in lights go to 13L and 13R... he made a mistake. The tower now has control over turning the lights on/off for 13R.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: flyflyfly on September 30, 2010, 01:46:04 PM
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/video?id=7697295&syndicate=syndicate&section

Pity, video won't show over here... Maybe US-only... But there is a text version:
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/investigators&id=7697310
Quote
"It's a night veteran air traffic controller Steve Abraham would like to forget.
[...]
The FAA has yet to get back to Eyewitness News on just how close the two planes got, but the Abraham says it was the closest of his 20 year career. He's also at a loss as to why the pilot tried to land on the wrong runway.
[...]
An internet flight tracking system showed the jet came within 300 feet of touching down on the runway."
300 feet!? :-o

Lead in lights go to 13L and 13R... he made a mistake. The tower now has control over turning the lights on/off for 13R.
No way!? ???  Are you saying tower was not in control of those lights before the incident? It actually took so many years and one close call to figure out this simple, low-tech safety measure? ("Oh, right, we could install a light switch!!"  :lol: ). You'd assume it to be natural standard, that any tower has control of all its runway lighting...
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: dlarokk on September 30, 2010, 03:16:50 PM
ABC's story sounds a bit sensationalistic.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: TC on September 30, 2010, 07:12:13 PM
How is possible that ATC did not detect that Aerogal ended up on the final for the wrong runway?

Somebody cleared him for approach and, I would hope, made sure that he was heading for the correct runway. Shouldn't the tower controller be first to detect the error (radar screen, visual observation)?

Before we send Aerogal crew for more training we may want to look on the ATC role in this incident.

How is (it) possible?  How?  Because we are responsible for many things in a tower cab that you don't hear on the radio.  Coordinations, handling strip movement, tower teamwork, etc.  We SEPARATE the planes, we don't babysit them.  The a/c was cleared for the approach to and cleared to land on a specific runway.  We don't have the luxury of having all the other planes stop in midair or on the ground while we stare at this 1 guy to make sure he doesn't mess up.  There are other planes on the surface moving around in close proximity to active runways, even crossing them at times.  We watch them, too.  We have to watch everyone.  And we have aids, but in this instance the ground radar WASN'T WORKING.  Thank the agency for that.  God bless the pilot who 1st said something.  God bless the controller who took quick action and averted a disaster that the pilot nearly caused by his screw up.  Even after the aerogal fails to respond to the controller's first frantic instructions to turn he remained cool under pressure and PREVENTED a collision!!  And you question his actions???  You want to "look at" HIS role??  His role is simple.  It's spelled H-E-R-O.  Your remarks and insinuation leave me stunned.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: TC on September 30, 2010, 07:23:04 PM


Lead in lights go to 13L and 13R... he made a mistake. The tower now has control over turning the lights on/off for 13R.
No way!? ???  Are you saying tower was not in control of those lights before the incident? It actually took so many years and one close call to figure out this simple, low-tech safety measure? ("Oh, right, we could install a light switch!!"  :lol: ). You'd assume it to be natural standard, that any tower has control of all its runway lighting...

[/quote]

And what would that do?  We're supposed to shut the lights off as JetBlue rolls down the runway?  Really?  Landing and departing on parallel  runways is something very common.  We can't just shut the lights off for all the runways aerogal or anyone else isn't cleared to land on!  There are other airport operations going on, people crossing and holding short of runways, etc.  You cannot just clear a guy to land and then shut off all the other lights.

The pilot made a mistake, plain and simple.  He brought his plane in to the wrong runway.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: flyflyfly on October 01, 2010, 03:10:02 AM

Quote
Lead in lights go to 13L and 13R... he made a mistake. The tower now has control over turning the lights on/off for 13R.
No way!? ???  Are you saying tower was not in control of those lights before the incident? It actually took so many years and one close call to figure out this simple, low-tech safety measure? ("Oh, right, we could install a light switch!!"  :lol: ). You'd assume it to be natural standard, that any tower has control of all its runway lighting...


And what would that do?  We're supposed to shut the lights off as JetBlue rolls down the runway?  Really?  Landing and departing on parallel  runways is something very common.  We can't just shut the lights off for all the runways aerogal or anyone else isn't cleared to land on!  There are other airport operations going on, people crossing and holding short of runways, etc.  You cannot just clear a guy to land and then shut off all the other lights.

The pilot made a mistake, plain and simple.  He brought his plane in to the wrong runway.

Obviously I was refering to the approach and lead in lights - not the main runway lights. There isn't much reason for lead in lights to flash when this runway is currently exclusively used for take off. And, as I understood NY Z Pilot, the controllers were now given control of these lead in lights (after the incident).

I'm not questioning responsibility here. It was Aerogal's fault alone. Full stop. But if you've ever read a report on an aviation incident, you'll know that aviation safety just doesn't stop at this level. It is also about circumstantial factors - be it of first, second or third degree. It's about naming all the details which influenced the occurrence of the incident. The ground radar being out of service, and lead in lights showing the way to a T/O-only runway would absoultely be mentioned as such factors here. Not because they would relief Aerogal of their responsibility - but because they are factors to be improved to even further reduce the chances of this happening again. And switching off approach lights is a pretty simple and cheap method to reduce the risk of misinterpretation, and already used at many/most airports for a long time (they had light switches, well, even in Soviet Russia, I guess... :-D).
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: svoynick on October 01, 2010, 03:21:37 AM
The pilot made a mistake, plain and simple.  He brought his plane in to the wrong runway.
There you go.  

And further, do you know what is supposed to be the primary backup for the pilot in situations like this?  The second pilot.  There are supposed to be two brains and two sets of eyes and ears in the cockpit that back each other up on procedures, checklists, safety issues, and all the important stuff - like approaching the correct runway for landing.  If there's anything to be "looked into" here, I might suggest it would be the effectiveness (or not...) of the CRM in the Aerogal cockpit.

So the question was asked:
Quote from: Heading090
How is possible that ATC did not detect that Aerogal ended up on the final for the wrong runway?
I might suggest that the more relevant question would be:

How is possible that two pilots - who have the primary function and responsibility of working as a team to safely fly the aircraft, and backing each other up in that endeavor - did not detect that they ended up on the final for the wrong runway?
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: MCM on October 01, 2010, 04:14:58 AM
Human factors strike again.

So, you use an approach such as the Canarsie which requires a late (for heavy jets) turn onto one of two parallel runways, BOTH of which are sometimes used, and you're surprised that someone misidentifies the runway when you have the lead in lights for BOTH runways on when only one is in use for landing?

Come on. Get with the times.

Yes the crew made an error. But so did the system. The crew didn't make the mistake on purpose. Its a mistake. And it was made more likely to occur by the way the airport is used. Any half decent risk analysis would have this kind of situation as a high probablity. Mitigators are available, and if you're going to insist on using late-turn approaches, use them.

There's a reason that straight in approaches are preferred - these kind of errors usually get picked up far earlier, and before there's any significant risk.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: Marty Becker on October 01, 2010, 07:22:43 AM
Quote
How is possible that two pilots - who have the primary function and responsibility of working as a team to safely fly the aircraft, and backing each other up in that endeavor - did not detect that they ended up on the final for the wrong runway?

Two pilots?  Since this was an international flight, I'd bet there was at least three crew members on the flight deck, since long haul flight carry an extra crew member for crew relief and breaks during cruise.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: TC on October 01, 2010, 12:12:14 PM
Obviously I was refering to the approach and lead in lights - not the main runway lights. There isn't much reason for lead in lights to flash when this runway is currently exclusively used for take off. And, as I understood NY Z Pilot, the controllers were now given control of these lead in lights (after the incident).

Well obviously it wasn't obvious.  But the agency typically issues a knee jerk reaction after an incident to show they're doing SOMETHING.  Often those initiatives are later cancelled, especially when they lead to another problem.

If an a/c is cleared for 13L, it would be helpful to see two 13's so he can determine which is right and which is left.  Shutting off lights is NOT a good idea.  The lights are visual aids that help the a/c see the airport and orientate themselves.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: NY Z Pilot on October 01, 2010, 12:17:55 PM

If an a/c is cleared for 13L, it would be helpful to see two 13's so he can determine which is right and which is left.  Shutting off lights is NOT a good idea.  The lights are visual aids that help the a/c see the airport and orientate themselves.
[/quote]

I do no agree with that, most foreign pilots follow the lead ins, see A RUNWAY, and assume that must be it. This is not the first time this has happened... its never gotten this close tho.


Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: flyflyfly on October 01, 2010, 01:39:14 PM
Obviously I was refering to the approach and lead in lights - not the main runway lights. There isn't much reason for lead in lights to flash when this runway is currently exclusively used for take off. And, as I understood NY Z Pilot, the controllers were now given control of these lead in lights (after the incident).

Well obviously it wasn't obvious.  But the agency typically issues a knee jerk reaction after an incident to show they're doing SOMETHING.  Often those initiatives are later cancelled, especially when they lead to another problem.

If an a/c is cleared for 13L, it would be helpful to see two 13's so he can determine which is right and which is left.  Shutting off lights is NOT a good idea.  The lights are visual aids that help the a/c see the airport and orientate themselves.

Of course, the runway itself should be lit (still obvious to me  :-) ). This is what helps pilots identifying the left and right runway.
But it is already standard that only the approach lights on the active end of a runway are lit. Not because pilots aren't smart enough to use a compass, but simply to help with visual orientation and reduce another (highly theoretical) risk.

About the JFK 13 R/L lead ins, have a look at this video (at linked time).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnEtr6Ei1sc#t=3m14s

You'll hear the captain say "second set of lights... JFK 3miles...".
These lead ins are quite far away from the actual runway. These sets of blinking lights aid pilots by marking the ground track of the right turn. Not much reason to mark the ground track of a forbidden turn to an inactive or t/o-only runway...
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: TC on October 01, 2010, 04:12:43 PM
Plenty of reason.  Might want to transition an a/c over to that runway and in order to clear him for the visual to that runway, he's gotta see it.  Do it all the time to maintain separation, which is after all, why we are there.  You want to believe that shutting off lights is going to enhance safety, you go right ahead.  I'll rely on my 20 yrs experience in atc that tells me otherwise.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: svoynick on October 01, 2010, 04:37:19 PM
Another reason is that, as a pilot, I want to see and orient myself to the airport as I know it from the approach plate.  I use everything from runway heading to the presence of parallel runways to confirm my orientation, position, etc.  It's my job to know that there are parallel runways out there, and my job to orient myself to the correct one.  I would rather have them both lit up as visibly as possible so I can satisfy myself that I'm in the correct position, rather than have my mental image expecting two parallel runways, and when I roll out on final, I only see a single one lit up.  I want ALL the information available for me to confirm my position matches what I'm cleared for, including selection of the correct parallel.

Now, I'll freely admit, I only fly dinky planes for fun - "real" pilots, feel free to set me straight as to what you prefer.

Quote from: NY Z Pilot
most foreign pilots follow the lead ins, see A RUNWAY, and assume that must be it.
Really?   Wow.   They don't use heading to confirm, or confirm that they're on the correct parallel, or....    Not that it hasn't happened before, as you assert, but you're not giving "foreign pilots" much credit here...
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: compressorStall on October 01, 2010, 05:50:33 PM
That clip was too funny, and more so in light of a recent experience I had. I was in a Cessna (as a pax) that nearly taxied into the path of a landing heavy fifteen seconds before touchdown... we were first in the line-up. Just as I happened to glance around behind us I noticed something. It took me a few seconds to register that the guy behind us was frantically flashing his landing lights and waving a phone in an attempt to keep us off the runway.

All this because ground gave us the wrong tower freq., and this was the pilot's first trip to that airport, so he assumed the perceived radio silence was SOP.
Just a clarification...  For the situation you described, are you saying this happened "because" the pilot got the wrong freq. from ground?  Respectfully, am I off-target to suggest that it happened because the pilot entered an active runway without a clearance?  

Are there controlled airports where it's "SOP" for silence to represent an implicit clearance?  (This is rhetorical...)

Clearance was not given, but the plane was still slowly inching towards the runway. Now that I think about it, the plane should have come to a full stop at the yellow lines. I'm actually listening to the ATC right now. Tower makes numerous attempts to contact the plane, all while it's on the wrong frequency given by ground.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: NY Z Pilot on October 01, 2010, 06:04:55 PM
I put foreign pilots because theyre the only ones that ever do it, no disrespect.  I guess since domestic pilots are familiar with the approach and on the INTL flights they dont do it often at all.
Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: MCM on October 01, 2010, 09:22:47 PM
The job of the strobes is to lead to the runway.

Why add confusion unnecessarily?

Turn OFF the strobes not in use.

Step two - don't have unfamiliar airlines flying the Canarsie. Its a very high workload approach (particularly in poor weather when it is still used) and there are safer alternatives available.

Title: Re: 767 almost lands on wrong runway at JFK Sunday 9/19
Post by: kenadams on October 06, 2010, 12:21:39 AM
The job of the strobes is to lead to the runway.
Why add confusion unnecessarily?
Turn OFF the strobes not in use.
Step two - don't have unfamiliar airlines flying the Canarsie. Its a very high workload approach (particularly in poor weather when it is still used) and there are safer alternatives available.

Strobes can add to the situational awareness even if they lead to the wrong runway. Pilots who brief the approach must know that there are four clusters of lead-in lights to line up with 13L, and only two clusters to line up to 13R.
Once they reach the first cluster of lights (altitude approximately 1000 feet) on the 041 heading the visual transition calls for, 13R is to their 3 o'clock, while the second cluster of lead-in lights is 12/1 o'clock. Having runway 13R in sight helps confirm their position relative to the airport and to the second cluster of lights to follow. All visual references are important when performing a visual approach.
As to the unfamiliarity of crews, the problem starts with the FAA. The whole Parkway Visual Approach is biased in that it has straight-in weather minimums instead of circling minimums. The coupling of tight room over Queens to allow regular operations at both LGA and JFK, with the concern for noise abatement has created an approach procedure that leaves little margin for error.