LiveATC Discussion Forums

Air Traffic Monitoring => Aviation Audio Clips => Topic started by: GeoffSM1 on April 27, 2017, 04:05:11 PM

Title: 24 April: Hard landing at Spirit of St Louis Airport (KSUS), Missouri
Post by: GeoffSM1 on April 27, 2017, 04:05:11 PM
Story and news video http://www.kmov.com/story/35230825/emergency-crews-respond-to-plane-crash-at-spirit-of-st-louis-airport

'As there was no distress call made, authorities believe the plane suffered a hard landing.'

Whilst it seems the pilot did not declare an emergency, after making two unsuccessful attempts to land on runway 8L he told the controller he was worried about fuel and asked  if there was a a grass area where he could land in a more favorable direction. Permission was refused. Subsequently the aircraft made the very heavy landing on the runway and sustained significant damage. The pilot was lucky not to be injured. If he had declared an emergency would he have been able to insist on landing on the grass?  Should the controller have given him the opportunity? In short, could the situation have been dealt with differently?
Title: Re: 24 April: Hard landing at Spirit of St Louis Airport (KSUS), Missouri
Post by: mike_ny on April 28, 2017, 05:51:31 PM
Geoff,
You are correct. For a fuel emergency, together with wind conditions which present a challenge for conventional gear (tailwheel) pilot, in an emergency the pilot-in-command is authorized to deviate from regulations as necessary for safety.
Quote
Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 91, section 91.3 allows deviations from regulations during emergencies that allow the PIC to make the best decision to ensure safety of all personnel during these contingencies. Also, by declaring an emergency during flight, that aircraft becomes a priority to land safely. Pilots who become apprehensive for their safety for any reason should request assistance immediately.

REF: Part 91, A, Section 91.3 (https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?rgn=div8&node=14:2.0.1.3.10.1.4.2)

If the runways and corresponding taxiways C, D, Z and W were clear(ed), it appears that taxiway C is oriented more closely with surface wind from the southeast.
Taxiway C (between E and A) (https://www.google.com/maps/@38.6613235,-90.6613492,1096m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en) is not completely straight, but that aircraft type would not typically require other than a short landing roll-out (at a relatively low, ground speed).
Large/tundra tires help for landing on a paved/un-paved surfaces.

Thankfully what matters most: it appears that no one was injured and there was a safe outcome for the pilot.
Title: Re: 24 April: Hard landing at Spirit of St Louis Airport (KSUS), Missouri
Post by: GeoffSM1 on April 28, 2017, 07:23:48 PM
Many thanks that comprehensive reply.