airtraffic

Author Topic: new ZJX Charts  (Read 63909 times)

Offline milguy11

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
new ZJX Charts
« on: May 03, 2019, 12:44:32 UTC »

Enjoy!



Offline sniderpac

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: new ZJX Charts
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2020, 05:35:35 UTC »
Does anyone know the validity of these frequencies? I have some charts from 2007. There are 4 frequencies that are different in this newer set. Just curious how the information was gathered.

Offline JetScan1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: new ZJX Charts
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2020, 16:41:30 UTC »
sniderpac,

Quote
Does anyone know the validity of these frequencies? I have some charts from 2007. There are 4 frequencies that are different in this newer set. Just curious how the information was gathered.

The charts posted by milguy11 appear to be the same type that would be published directly from the Center/FAA. As far as I can tell, using various LiveATC feeds and personal experience, all the VHF frequencies listed on the charts are current and correct as of the last few months. I can't confirm any of the UHF frequencies.

Comparing some older charts it does look they made a few tweaks to some of the sectors and frequencies. What 4 frequencies are you talking about ?


Offline sniderpac

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: new ZJX Charts
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2020, 18:50:22 UTC »
Yeah, I wasn't sure of the source of the information, whether from the FAA or just enthusiasts listening and trying to sort it out. I have the 2007 chart, Nepta (30) was 124.775, Waycross (29) has 2 frequencies. AMG 132.3 and VLD 125.95. Allendale (73) also had 2 frequencies, QMG 132.5 and SAV 120.85. Charleston (74) also had 2 frequencies. CHS 127.95 and MYR 128.7. Unsure if the dual frequencies were combined into a new frequency. I suppose that could be the reason if this is truly FAA data. Having some knowledge of the sector map, this does appear to be consistent with the FAA.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2020, 18:52:32 UTC by sniderpac »

Offline nycrich

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: new ZJX Charts
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2020, 16:07:43 UTC »
These charts belong to Florida Scanner Radio Group. We have excellent radio coverage for ZMA and limited for ZJX as most members are from Central Florida to South Florida. I provided the original FAA ATC charts for ZMA /ZJX 2010, and one of our members Doug Graham made that chart based on a combination of monitoring from the groups and the FAA charts provided.

Offline nycrich

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: new ZJX Charts
« Reply #5 on: August 28, 2020, 16:11:35 UTC »
The ZMA charts are 100% correct for VHF and UHF. There is some UHF military discrete for ZMA  that changes.

Offline nycrich

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: new ZJX Charts
« Reply #6 on: August 28, 2020, 16:14:33 UTC »
Northern parts of ZJX UHF was not confirmed.
« Last Edit: August 29, 2020, 12:08:29 UTC by nycrich »

Offline kd4moj

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: new ZJX Charts
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2021, 20:19:02 UTC »
Greetings:

I've verified the following frequencies today from the Tallahassee ZJX RCAG site:

125.050
128.075
128.625


...DOUG
KD4MOJ




Offline rentkonim

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • اجاره خودرو با راننده
Re: new ZJX Charts
« Reply #8 on: August 31, 2021, 12:40:58 UTC »
The ultra-high sectors as depicted on that ZMA chart don't seem to correspond to how the sectors are actually set up ? Maybe they have changed recently but in the not so distant past Sector 17 APOLO (ultra-high) and Sector 02 HOBEE (high) shared the same lateral boundary and were split vertically, not north/south as separate sectors as depicted. Same with Sector 18 ADOOR (high) and Sector 19 NUCAR (ultra-high).